Skip to content

Audit Module

Source document: modules/en/audit/README.md / Propose an edit

The Audit Module handles transparency, audit logs, decision history, accounting transparency, authority changes, and conflict-of-interest records.

Audit is not a tool for creating surveillance. It must separate transparency from privacy.

Cooperation infrastructure becomes corrupt or untrusted when decisions, accounting, authority changes, support judgments, reputation evaluations, or arbitration decisions become opaque.

At the same time, recording everything can become surveillance and expose participants unnecessarily.

  • Decision logs
  • Authority change history
  • Accounting transparency
  • Proposal and Decision tracking
  • Auditable change history
  • Conflict-of-interest records
  • Misuse detection
  • Definition of audit scope
  • Separation of public and protected information
  • Appeals against audit findings
  • Surveillance of private life
  • Monitoring all communications
  • Belief monitoring
  • Centralization of audit authority
  • Privacy violations in the name of transparency
  • Rule by auditors
  • Unnecessary exposure of participants who need anonymity or safety
  • Governance: records decisions and authority changes
  • Economy: checks accounting, donations, expenses, and point designs
  • Welfare: handles transparency of support conditions and decisions
  • Arbitration: connects to evidence, rationale, and appeals
  • Infrastructure: connects to logs, backups, and tamper resistance
  • Reputation: verifies evaluation evidence and changes

Audit should mean making necessary scopes verifiable, not granting a universal right to observe everything.

Early work should focus on Decision Logs, Pull Request history, financial transparency, authority changes, and conflict-of-interest records.

  • What should be public and what should be protected?
  • Who audits the auditors?
  • How can privacy and transparency be balanced?
  • How can audit logs resist tampering?
  • How much accounting or point history should be public?
  • How should different legal systems be handled?